You may have noticed yesterday that your internet connection was rather sluggish, or perhaps went down entirely. You were not alone: problems were reported around the world. We even had issues here at the Telegraph.
Auction site eBay, for instance, collapsed for much of the day. The company has not explained the exact nature of the problem, but admitted in a statement that “technical experts identified this was due to upstream Internet Service Provider (ISP) issues”. Password manager LastPass was also affected, leaving customers locked out of their accounts.
If there’s one thing everyone should remember about the internet, it’s that your data is never truly safe.
Case in point: a Russian cyber gang has made off with around 1.2 billion username and password combos and 542 million email addresses, Hold Security researchers told The New York Times. The publication noted this is the largest collection of stolen internet credentials yet known.
These credentials were reportedly gathered using botnets and SQL injections from around 420,000 different websites, ranging from the very large and to fairly small. The security firm won’t name these sites, in part because of nondisclosure agreements, but it has begun alerting them.
A political battle has broken out on Wikipedia over an entry relating to the crash of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17, with the Russian government reportedly removing sections which accuse it of providing “terrorists” with missiles that were used to down the civilian airliner.
A Twitter bot which monitors edits made to the online encyclopaedia from Russian government IP addresses (unique numbers relating to certain computers or networks) has spotted that changes are being made to a page relating to the crash.
It appears that an internet user from within the All-Russia State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company (VGTRK) changed a Russian language version of a page listing civil aviation accidents to say that “The plane [flight MH17] was shot down by Ukrainian soldiers”.
We put a ton of trust in technology everyday, but are you confident enough in two-factor authentication to give out any of your passwords? Christopher Mims of The Wall Street Journal is. In a post on the site proclaiming that passwords are “finally dying,” Mims extolls the virtues of the secure login method immediately after giving out his Twitter password. He says that he’s confident he won’t be hacked because, among other reasons, the second authentication step (a text message containing a numerical code that’s sent to the user’s cellphone, or an app that generates a code should you be outside of cellular data range) is apparently difficult to intrude upon
“I have a weird question for you,” I stammered, sitting in a hotel room across from Matias Duarte and Jon Wiley, the Google design leads for Android and Search, respectively. As a reporter, you tend to ask a lot of stupid sounding questions, and it’s generally no big deal. But I was about to ask an extremely stupid sounding question—the type of question that, just by breathing it into the air, might out me as actually stupid, tainting every future conversation we’d have to come.
In May, the EU Court of Justice ruled that because people have the “right to be forgotten,” Google must remove links from European versions of search, just because people ask them to. But you can’t hide from the past on the internet.
The requirement that Google take down links for the right to be forgotten is just lame censorship. Overtly! It’s the removal of inconvenient facts from published public view because somebody wants the facts to disappear. It’s a bit like the producers of Friday Night Lights calling on the Ministry of Truth to have Season 2 erased from the record because it’s inferior to the rest of the series.
The advert offers a wonder slimming supplement with “100% satisfaction guaranteed”. For just £4.95 postage and packaging, applicants receive a free bottle of the herbal remedy NutriBerry Slim for a 14-day “risk-free” trial. The website also suggests a free try-out of a natural detoxification product Vita Cleanse for a further £6.95 p&p.
Anne Jones (not her real name) signed up for both. Two weeks later £182 was removed from her account. And each subsequent month the same sum has disappeared. “I realised my mistake, emailed the cancellation email address within an hour of ordering and have continued to do so for the last 19 days, but I have had no reply and my bank tells me it can’t stop the payments, only dispute and refund them each time,” she says.